![]() Speaking Skills List Convertible into a public speaking evaluation forms. Skills Public Speech Critique and how to improve public speaking. Now you will have a content public speech critique or public speaking evaluation for the speakers you hear. If there are other speakers, rate each using this system, rating it between 1 and 5.Īdd the two and average the number and you have a way of rating your public speech as well as giving an overall public speech critique. Rank each of the above parts on a scale of one to five, one being the poor end of the spectrum and five being excellent.Īdd the numbers up and come up with an average. Did the speaker make them stand out? Conclusion and a Call to Actionĭid the speaker have an effective conclusion? Was there a call to action? Did the conclusion sum up the talk? Did the conclusion tie together the theme and the introduction? Was the subject or idea pervasive throughout the speech. ![]() Were the various sections connected to each next section. Was the public speech clear, logical and consistent. If new information, was it accurate and up to date. Is the theme clear and understandable throughout the presentation? Did the speaker use terms understandable to the audience? Did the speaker use the simplest words to express the theme or was there excess verbiage? Knowledge Baseĭid the speaker just rehash old information or did he make it come to life. If the introduction is overdone, people will remember the introduction but forget the talk. Higher scores should be given for more creative introductions. The introduction should not only introduce the theme, it should also capture the attention of the audience. On a scale of one to five, one being poor and five being excellent, rate each of the following aspects of the talk. Critiquing the content of a public speech involves looking at the parts of the content and the information of the overall presentation. Capitalist unrealism: Countering the crisis of critique and imagination. A public speech critique can be based on content or delivery. I will analyze what I accomplished effectively when I delivered my speech. Introduction (Gain and Maintain, Thesis, Preview), that tells the reader the name of the famous speaker, the purpose and/or title of the speech and a preview of the contents in the body.This will look at the content public speech critique. Name: Sandra Cash ID 971382Date: December 5, 2010 SPE1075 Critique In this critique I will analyze how I delivered my tribute speech on Decemat my church. Papers that are have less than 4 pages of text will receive a zero!.4 full pages of text - typed paper double spaced (approximately 1000 words).Cover page with your name, class and a title for your paper.ALL of these speeches utilize metaphors - do not say you couldn't find any because they are there.if the metaphor of a tiger is used what images are created in your mind? do we see something strong, ferocious, wild - do those images work with what the speaker was trying to convey? remember this is based on what YOU see so make it personal) Personalize: do a metaphoric analysis (think about the images created in the mind of the listener (YOU), talk about those possible images and what they represent - then explain why you think this particular metaphor was used.What metaphors were used? Were they effective? Why or why not?.Alliterations - Did the speaker use any? Were they effective? Why or why not?.Anaphora - Did the speaker use any? Were they effective? Why or why not?.Your personal favorite line and explain why that section stood out to you.Word choices - why you think this speaker selected particular words or phrases, what images were being created? Was the wording effective or not?.(Note: keep in mind most presidential speeches are limited to a podium with no movement, basically they have NO choice in that matter but you can address how their placement or lack of movement affected the delivery) Delivery style should include the following:. ![]() If you recommend the speaker should have lifted their volume indicate which words should have had a higher volume. ![]() If you say the speaker lifted the volume, quote the line that was stated when the volume increased. VERY IMPORTANT: do not be vague! When you describe something you MUST connect it to the transcript. That is not the purpose of this assignment. In other words do not tell me you like or dislike the person - do not tell me that the beliefs expressed are not in line with your beliefs. This is NOT to be a format for the student to talk about their political beliefs - it is purely a critique of the content and delivery. After seeing and reading the speech students are to write a critique of the delivery, content and metaphors. The assignment is to watch the full speech, then to read the speech transcript. If the link is broken please contact the instructor as soon as possible. The links to view the speeches are available on the webpage. Students will be assigned a particular famous speech to critique this semester.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |